05-04-07, 08:10 PM | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Scroll to the bottom of this article for Cosgrove's HIIT suggestion.
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/alwyn8.htm What little I know of IMAX blasts, I'm guessing that blasts only wouldn't really be intervals, just high intensity throughout. I think that there are all kinds of HIIT variations, as far as how long to be "high intensity" and not. |
05-05-07, 02:04 PM | |
VF Supporter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: My body is in Louisville but my heart is in Atlanta
|
It's not that hard a read (although I hate the know-it-all tone). Basically, he says that the harder you work, the more calories you burn. And working at an anaerobic level will raise your metabolism so that you continue to burn calories at a higher rate even when you aren't working out. He says that during steady state cardio, you are burning calories, but only while you are working out, not when you are not working out.
He explains that the belief that doing cardio at lower intensity burns more fat is a misinterpretation of the research. You burn more fat calories "as a percentage" of total calories BUT higher intensity cardio burns more calories overall. |
05-05-07, 03:02 PM | |
VF Supporter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: My body is in Louisville but my heart is in Atlanta
|
Mary,
I figured I should do it more than 3 times, but the article has you work up to 5 times. I did 8 times. Do you think I should increase my intensity so that I can only do it 5 times, or just stick with the intensity I used when I did it 8 times. My HR (after the warm up) went from 170 (at the end of the 1 min high) to 140 (at the end of the 2 minute steady state) During the later circuits, I went from 170 (at the end of the 1 minute high) to 155 (at the end of the 2 minute steady state). I consider my max HR to be 190. I feel that I was getting a very intense workout, but I want to do this HIIT stuff right. I guess I should just try it at a higher level and see what happens. |
05-05-07, 04:21 PM | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
I'm not so sure there's any 'right' way. I think the whole idea is just get your HR up into anaerobic and back down repeatedly, for 20 mins. or more. I'm no expert, though.
I've seen people here who think that the anaerobic phases need to be like puking intensity, or 'can't do any more period'. I don't really see how that's going to work on a treadmill, though. If you really are struggling that much you're probably at an unsafe place on a treadmill, in my opinion. I get my HR up over 90% of max and figure that's the goal. It's plenty intense and uncomfortable. My legs can always go faster, but it just doesn't feel safe to push both 'systems' toward failure like that, on a treadmill. |
Tags |
abb, aerobic base building |
|
|